Gibe said:i honestly wonder how many replies we'll see to that idiots first remark before ppl start reading the thread, and realize everyone knows he was wrong, and is stupid.
Hehe, this happens in every thread.
Gibe said:i honestly wonder how many replies we'll see to that idiots first remark before ppl start reading the thread, and realize everyone knows he was wrong, and is stupid.
Ok, so the GT is likely a better drag car. That doesn't matter. For cars like this the only comparison is lap times. Nurburgring, Laguna Seca, etcs. No ovals.Kid Antrim said:GT: 0-60 3.6 seconds
F50: 0-60 3.7 seconds
GT: V8 @ 500HP, 500 lb.ft
F50: V12 @ 520HP, 347 lb.ft
GT: Roughly $150,000
F50: $500,000+
The GT takes it in my book because it's just a better deal for the same amount of automobile. The GT is capable of 200mph, as is the F50.
Reno said:Ok, so the GT is likely a better drag car. That doesn't matter. For cars like this the only comparison is lap times. Nurburgring, Laguna Seca, etcs. No ovals.
I believe Bob Lutz said the next Corvette Z06 (probably will be labeled the Z07) will "blow the doors off" of the GT.