Hobby Lobby Wins Contraceptive Ruling in Supreme Court
- Thread starter havax
- Start date
Kerosene31
Veteran XV
Oh sure, I'm certain Hobby Lobby pays well enough that people can afford all sorts of private care.
Texas Dragon
Veteran XX
another shitty 5-4 decision by the horrible roberts court
and please don't give me the "they have the right to work for another company" BS, because people have their pick of jobs nowadays, right?
and please don't give me the "they have the right to work for another company" BS, because people have their pick of jobs nowadays, right?
Oh sure, I'm certain Hobby Lobby pays well enough that people can afford all sorts of private care.
Hobby Lobby actually gives yearly $1 raises to all their full time employees. One of the few companies that actually do this.
you're all fucking stupid
what does it matter anyway, this ruling is dumb
we will all have to pay for the perpetually open-legged women anyway when the government decides to give out free contraception after this ruling through the form of taxes, so what does it fucking matter?
fucking idiots
what does it matter anyway, this ruling is dumb
we will all have to pay for the perpetually open-legged women anyway when the government decides to give out free contraception after this ruling through the form of taxes, so what does it fucking matter?
fucking idiots
Actually, the religious left is much more rabid and scary. They want to use the government to force people to do as they believe in. They don't believe in individual freedoms as the "good of all" comes first.
o are u not fucking these women
or do u actually follow that rule of the bible
or do u actually follow that rule of the bible
i'm just pointing out how rabid you are for nothing
vs paying billions of dollars for missile defense system
other countries weapons
perpetual war
tax escape loops for giant corporations and the 1%
cuz those are good things and social and health care for people is wrong america #1 christian nation
SCOTUS tries to draw the line at contraception, but they don't provide a reason why that line is where it is. I mean, it's fully accepted that certain religions are able to refuse vaccinations and blood transfusions, personally - but the court draws the line, and specifically says this ruling does not apply to those religious beliefs - only contraception.
If this was really about "religious liberty", it should cover all religious beliefs, right? This is religious liberty - for conservative christians, and no one else. If Muslims were to have a non-contraception related problem with something in the ACA (or any other law), they'd be out of luck, even though the same logic applies.
If this was really about "religious liberty", it should cover all religious beliefs, right? This is religious liberty - for conservative christians, and no one else. If Muslims were to have a non-contraception related problem with something in the ACA (or any other law), they'd be out of luck, even though the same logic applies.
for old white people by old white people
ah yes, people like dare are now the wise ones in society
that should tell you how fucked we all are
no offense, dare
like ive said multiple times
the disagreements between both sides are too huge to fix at this point
let the conservatives become a theocracy in perpetual war with muslims where abortion is wrong women stay in the kitchen and everyone prays
let the democrats have legal weed socialized health care womens rights and invest in green technology instead of war
the disagreements between both sides are too huge to fix at this point
let the conservatives become a theocracy in perpetual war with muslims where abortion is wrong women stay in the kitchen and everyone prays
let the democrats have legal weed socialized health care womens rights and invest in green technology instead of war
like havax you can't even find it appalling that generic drugs in india that past patent in the states cost something like 4-5 bux for a whole prescription but in the states its hundreds of dollars
these arent even new drugs under patent its shit thats been around for 60 or 70 years
but you're proud of that and think its irresponsible (in the insane conservative sense) for a person that got hit by a drunk driver while walking down the street and is now paralyzed but luckily got free medical care on their 300k hospital visit not to magically pay that money back
these arent even new drugs under patent its shit thats been around for 60 or 70 years
but you're proud of that and think its irresponsible (in the insane conservative sense) for a person that got hit by a drunk driver while walking down the street and is now paralyzed but luckily got free medical care on their 300k hospital visit not to magically pay that money back